NCAA Tournament March Madness
#330 Tarleton St
Bubble Watch | Bracketology
Chat with the Bracketologist | How does this work?
Projection: need to automatically qualify
Tarleton State's resume raises significant concerns, particularly highlighted by a series of heavy losses against quality opponents like Baylor and Michigan, which found them struggling to create competitive matchups. Their offense ranks poorly and has demonstrated a tendency to falter significantly, as shown by their inability to reach 70 points in critical games. Despite a couple of narrow victories, including a hard-fought win against Hofstra, the overall lack of signature wins and the inability to consistently compete against even mid-tier opponents casts doubt on their at-large viability. The remainder of the season presents limited high-profile opportunities for them to elevate their standing; the focus will need to be on winning the conference tournament to secure a spot in the NCAA field.
Date | Opponent | Ranking | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|
11/4 | @SMU | 34 | L96-62 |
11/9 | Sam Houston St | 165 | L91-62 |
11/12 | @Florida St | 76 | L72-52 |
11/17 | @Baylor | 23 | L104-41 |
11/21 | @Michigan | 22 | L72-49 |
11/29 | (N)Iona | 288 | L62-51 |
11/30 | (N)Hofstra | 173 | W61-59 |
12/1 | (N)Indiana St | 198 | L87-71 |
12/8 | @UCF | 92 | L66-51 |
12/16 | @UTEP | 129 | L67-62 |
12/18 | @Oklahoma St | 116 | L66-61 |
12/29 | Florida A&M | 346 | 56% |
1/4 | UT Arlington | 188 | 44% |
1/9 | @Southern Utah | 229 | 39% |
1/11 | @Utah Tech | 276 | 42% |
1/16 | Cal Baptist | 157 | 43% |
1/18 | @Grand Canyon | 132 | 34% |
1/23 | @Abilene Chr | 235 | 39% |
1/30 | Utah Tech | 276 | 50% |
2/1 | Southern Utah | 229 | 47% |
2/6 | @Seattle | 135 | 34% |
2/8 | @Utah Valley | 136 | 34% |
2/13 | Grand Canyon | 132 | 41% |
2/15 | Seattle | 135 | 41% |
2/22 | @UT Arlington | 188 | 37% |
2/27 | Abilene Chr | 235 | 47% |
3/6 | @Cal Baptist | 157 | 35% |
3/8 | Utah Valley | 136 | 41% |